FROM THE ARCHIVE ✕ ANCESTRY ✕ MOBILE

Person Page Update

One person-page framework for every access level and both platforms — a Maps-style details drawer that keeps you in context.

ROLE
Designer
TIMELINE
2021–2024
PLATFORMS
iOS · Android
COMPANY
Ancestry
Person Page Update — key screens

At a glance

  • Role: Designer
  • Timeline: 2021–2024
  • Platforms: iOS · Android
  • Context: The most-used surface in the product

The problem

The Person Page is the most-used part of Ancestry — it’s where all of an ancestor’s details, sources, photos, and facts live. It had taken a design-system refresh, but it needed a real redesign. It also had to become several things at once: a lite view, a view-only view, and a fully editable view, depending on access. And iOS and Android had drifted into different mental models — those needed to become one.

The approach

I audited the surface across web, iOS, and Android and compared what each access level could actually do. That comparison is what the framework had to absorb.

The move that unlocked it came from mapping apps. Apple Maps and Google Maps don’t yank you to a new screen when you tap a place — they raise a details drawer over the map and keep your context. I borrowed that: rather than forcing people to bounce between the tree and a person, the redesign brings the person up in a drawer, in context. The framework then layers information progressively by access level, so a restricted view keeps the same visual hierarchy as a full one — just with less inside it.

Apple Maps' details-drawer pattern — the starting inspiration.
The starting point: the Maps details-drawer pattern
The redesigned person page raised in context over the tree — timeline, sources, family.
The person page, in context over the tree

Tablets got the same idea. Instead of a phone layout stretched across a big screen, the person sits in a floating sidebar that can expand to fullscreen — the drawer pattern, scaled up.

A fuller, editable person page laid out for scanning.
Layered for scanning — the fuller, editable view

Outcome

Testing came back positive — people liked the changes and the new capabilities, and the sections that rolled out performed well. More than any single screen, it left a framework the surface could keep growing into, including the DNA integration we’d started to explore.